To an individual/organization or other entity with an interest in the future of the Philippines’ banking industry

 
 
We, an organization named DEADBOL (Depositors Enabling All Depositors in Banks Of Legacy), thought that it may be of some interest to you to become aware that a huge number of OFWs (Overseas Filipino Workers), expatriates currently residing in the Philippines, and other foreigners with financial interests in the Philippines, will no longer trust another peso of their hard-earned money to become part of the Philippines banking industry. They will be depositing their monies in the countries where they now reside or were former residents of, but more importantly, in countries that they trust to secure their financial futures.
 
Many of the aforementioned mistakenly believed that the assurances posted within Philippine bank premises, along with the same being stated on a government departmental website, were in fact true. What we are referring to here are the PDIC’s (Philippine Deposit Insurance Corporation) misleading statements about deposit insurance in the Philippines. Indeed, they actually state that their vision is to be a ‘world-class’ organization in depositor protection and that they actually “exercise complementary supervision” of the banks that they oversee.
 
These have been proven to be just meaningless words, issued to bestow a false confidence upon a nation of unsuspecting depositors. In practice, PDIC don’t even come close to ‘world class’ and second class would be paying them a huge complement.
 
Members of DEADBOL, and thousands of others, had the misfortune of depositing their hard-earned monies in banks supervised by PDIC, and are now paying a huge price for believing the statements proudly promoted by this government entity. Many even encouraged family members to deposit into the Philippine economy, only now to rue the day that they gave such encouragement. Family’s have been torn apart by PDIC’s inability to act on its mandated obligations.
 
It has now been ten months since PDIC supervised banks closed, and more than the mandated six months since claims were finally allowed to be filed. Many claimants have still not heard the slightest murmur from PDIC regarding their claims. Some, admittedly, have received a very small percentage of their overall claims, but this feels like the deployment of yet another confidence trick, nothing but fire-fighting by the PDIC. They are certainly doing nothing to eradicate the inferno.
 
 
Some depositors have now received demands for additional proof of ownership of deposits; proof that many attempted to provide at the time their claims were submitted, but refused by the very corporation now demanding such after six months of procrastination. Threats of denial are even issued with such requests if the demands are not met in a timely manner. To add extra anxiety, the PDIC demands such evidence via the inefficient Philippines postal service, sometimes not arriving at the recipient’s home address until expiry of the ‘cut-off’ date, hence denial of the claim.
 
Although PDIC demand punctual compliance with their demands for further evidence of deposit; when supplied to them, depositors cannot expect to be compensated in anything like a timely manner. We know that depositors providing such evidence have still not been compensated after more than three months since providing such. Still they wait!
 
Depositors have been condemned in the newspapers and other media, by PDIC, for being stupid and depositing in a banking system in which the PDIC provide complementary supervision. PDIC say that depositors should have known better than to use it.
 
PDIC, since the closing of these banks, states that depositors need to ensure that seven separate ‘internal’ bank documents are on file with any bank in which deposits are placed, for each transaction, or face denial of claims submitted should the bank close. These internal documents also need to be made available on an ongoing basis, as it is possible for a bank to be closed at any moment in time.
 
Since hearing such absurd comments coming from the upper hierarchy of Philippine government, affected depositors have asked their bank managers  (banks in which other deposits are held) if they can verify on a monthly basis that these internal documents are present and correct on the depositors’ accounts. Naturally, and expectedly, the depositors were laughed at and told that these documents are checked by BSP (Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas i.e. Central bank of Philippines) and PDIC audits. Therefore, PDIC making such a statement that any problems with these internal documents is grounds for a denial on claims effectively makes depositors responsible for the day-to-day management of the banks in which the deposit. That is simply ludicrous.
 
PDIC claims that the closing of the Legacy banks overwhelmed them, and they are not prepared to handle claim volumes of that size (approximately 14 billion pesos in 130,000 accounts). Yet at the same time their vision is to be ‘world-class’.
 
One has to wonder what would happen if a large bank such as PNB (Philippine National Bank), BPI (Bank of the Philippine Islands) or BDO (Banco De Oro) were closed; how long it would take to compensate its depositors? Using the criteria that PDIC have recently been working with, it would take decades for all depositors to eventually be reunited with their hard-earned monies.
 
 
In reality, we depositors believe we know the reason for the fiasco that we are all too aware that we are involved in.
 
PDIC is bankrupt!
 
We know they owe BSP billions more pesos than they claim to have in their own DIF (Deposit Insurance Fund), and we also know that most of their funds are tied up in propping up larger commercial banks; UCPB (United Coconut Planters Bank) for example.
 
Our organization comprises of many walks-of-life, from all over the world. Some have had to deal with real ‘world-class’ deposit insures in their past, and have been compensated with monies due them in a matter of days. Not months, or years, or never!
 
The FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) in the United States has been known to compensate within seventy-two hours. The FSCS (Financial Services Compensation Scheme) in the United Kingdom recently responded to the closure of a bank by temporarily removing its ceiling on the amount that a depositor could hold in an account, and guaranteed every private depositor the return of all their monies regardless of how much they had in their account. They were reimbursed shortly after without inconvenience or harrassment. These are just a few examples. We could provide more to illustrate how a caring world-class deposit insurer conducts itself.
 
The unfortunate experience of a depositor in a closed bank in the Philippines goes something like this:
 
Wait three months after the bank has been closed.
 
Travel hundreds of kilometers to pick up a claim form, to be given a date on which a claim can be filed.
 
 Travel hundreds of kilometers again to simply hand in the completed claim form.
 
Be required to give up the original CTD, which wasn’t previously required, only to be told months later that it was a mistake and we could have given them copies, which at the time they refused.
 
Be reassured by PDIC staff that everything is fine and we will see results after 30 days,
 
After 30 days, be told to wait 2 more months.
 
After 2 months, be told to wait 2 weeks.
 
After 2 weeks, be told to wait another 2 weeks.
 
After another 2 weeks be told to wait another 3 months.
 
At this point, do you think that anyone believes anything the PDIC announce?
 
The vision to become a world-class deposit insurer is better described as a mirage, an illusion, or a myth. It is merely a confidence trick used to lure unsuspecting and innocent people into a potential life of turmoil, hardship and desperation.
 
Our mission and vision is to enlighten and educate those both in the Philippines and abroad the perils of trusting money to the Philippine banking system. Better, and much safer opportunities exist elsewhere. OFWs, their patriotism undeserved by an uncaring government, need to be made aware that their financial security lies elsewhere (often in their country of residence), in countries where trust in its banking industry is respected, not exploited.
 
Remittance to loved ones should only be for their day-to-day needs. Our expatriate members know how this is achieved in a cost effective manner, bypassing any requirement to deposit such monies in Philippine banks, where residing money is put at risk by snail-paced authorities. We can help our OFW neighbors achieve such, and reduce their risks.
 
A big difference between the PDIC and us is that we will deliver our mission, and fulfil our vision. Of that we are sure.
 
DEADBOL

 

 We, DEADBOL, are a selfless organisation and are not prepared to sit back and watch the injustice bestowed upon the unfortunates. Mankind deserves much better than what is delivered by this farce of a government corporation. OFWs, expatriates, foreign interests, as well as the Filipino, all deserve much better than what is on offer.

An Open Letter to the President of the Philippines

Greetings to the Office of the President,

Dear Sir/madam:

We thought you should know why we, OFWs and expats living here have lost our trust in the Philippine banking system.  We, the OFWs, arenow looking on depositing our hard-earned monies to offshore banks.
We, the expats, also recommend to new arrivals of expats to leave their money in their home countries and just bring in day to day living expenses.

We are one of the numerous numbers of OFWs and expats that mistakenly believed the posted information at local banks that deposits were
covered by PDIC, Philippine Deposit Insurance Corp, and saw their posted goal on their web page that they strive to be a “World Class Deposit Insurance Corp”.

In practice, however, they don’t even come close to world class and probably not even second class.

We, as many OFWs and expats, had the misfortune of depositing large sums of money in the Legacy banks, as did our wives or husbands, mothers and children for their education and future.   It has been ten
months since the banks were closed and more than six months since we filed claims, yet we have not heard one word from PDIC except to say,
if you call, they are working on the claims.

Some have received demands for additional proof of ownership of deposits; proof that many of us attempted to provide at the time the claims were filed but refused by PDIC, who now, after six months of procrastination, demands it under threat of denial of claims.  We see these actions as nothing more than deliberate delaying tactics. Those that were asked for additional information more than three months ago are still waiting for checks. However, the majority of us haven’t heard anything yet.

We have been condemned, in the newspapers, by PDIC for being stupid and depositing in a bank system that they said we should have known better than to use.  We have been advised that we are personally
responsible to insure that seven separate documents are on file with any bank we use, for each transaction, or face denial of PDIC claims.
When we ask bank managers if we can verify monthly that these documents are present on our accounts, they laugh at us and say that PDIC doesn’t know what they are talking about and the documents are
checked by BSP and PDIC audits.  We are also told by PDIC that if bank documents are missing, our claim will be denied, which in essence makes us responsible for the management of any bank we deposit in.

PDIC claims that the closing of the Legacy banks overwhelmed them and
they are not prepared to handle claim volumes of that size. One has to wonder what would happen if PNB or BPI or BDO was closed, how long it would take? Maybe ten years to get paid? In reality, we believe we
know the reason. PDIC is broke. We know they owe BSP billions more than they claim to have and we also know that most of their funds are tied up in propping up larger commercial banks; UCPB comes to mind.

Some of us (expats) had money in a bank in the U.S. that closed while we were living here. Seventy-two hours after the bank closed, we were
able to withdraw our money via the internet.

Our experience with PDIC – wait three months and have to travel hundreds of kilometers to pick up a form and be given a specific day and time to travel hundreds of kilometers again to simply turn in the
completed claim form. Be required to give up the original CTD, which wasn’t previously required, only to be told months later that it was a mistake and we could have given them copies which at the time they
refused. Then be told by PDIC staff that everything was fine and we would see results after 30 days, at the end of April 2009. Of course that was not true, and a new deadline of the end of June and then mid July and then the end of August, and now the end of
October. Do you think anyone believes anything they say at this point?

Which example do you think represents “World Class Deposit Insurance”?
Wonder why nobody believes PDIC’s claim of “World Class Deposit
Insurance”?

We belong to a group of Legacy depositors that came together in self defense against PDIC attacks on legitimate depositors. As a group (called DEADBOL), we haven’t seen any significant number paid in the
ten months since closing. Some of us have been told by our friends to expect to wait two years as that has been their past experience with PDIC.  As per PDIC charter, they are mandated by law to pay within 6
months from date of filing – that is the end of October.

We appeal to you, Mrs. President, to intervene with PDIC.   We have been suffering too long already waiting for our hard-earned monies.
Please help us!

Thank you so much for your time and we look forward to your kind assistance.

PDIC: We are all tired and gone -Waiting for you!

It has been months and months of waiting…still eating dried fish full of bones, no more meat at all. Until when  will this continue?

I am already getting tired of waiting. Is this the world-class service  insurance PDIC is promising? This is beyond nightmare already. I could not help but think of the future repercussions this will bring to our economy. I do not want to be there when the “sh*t hits the fan”.

What else can we do?

The senators are trying to distance themselves away from this mess. No one wants to hear our pleas, nobody bothers to follow up our concerns from the government.  Does this mean the legit depositors will wait forever?

The claims filing of the other non-legacy rural banks are in progress. The PDIC personnel told us that the checks will be sent after six months right off the bat. Oh, how convenient !!

Since the legacy fiasco, more rural banks have closed, like a domino-effect. That this mean the demise of rural banking is in the crystal ball? 

Who do we blame for this hoopla and hulla balloo? The depositors or the governing body which is supposed to be there to regulate banking policies and protect the depositors.

Will you still deposit your money to any Philippine bank? I will  keep my money under my rug or in my vault for now!!

PDIC: Dates moved AGAIN!

MANILA, Philippines – The state-owned Philippine Deposit Insurance Corp.
 said it would shell out P10.7 billion to settle the valid deposit claims
 filed by clients of the defunct rural banks under the controversial
 Legacy group.
>
 PDIC president Jose Nograles said his office was committed to settling
 all the valid deposit claims, noting it had sufficient funds to do so.
The deposit insurer targets to make all the checks available for release
 before the end of October.
>
 “From day one, we have been straightforward in saying that funding for
 the Legacy payout of valid claims was more than sufficient. The problem
 laid in distinguishing between what were valid and invalid deposit
 accounts. We have resolved that,” Nograles said.
>
 Deposits placed in the Legacy-owned rural banks were estimated at P14
 billion. PDIC, however, said that following the process of validating
 all deposit claims, only P10.7 billion of these were found valid.
>
 The balance included denied deposit claims (P374 million), claims with
 incomplete supporting documents (P1.15 billion), and claims that were
 referred to PDIC’s legal department for further verification (P1.78
 billion).
>
 PDIC said the 12 Legacy-owned banks placed under its receivership late
 last year had a capital deficiency of P16.64 billion. This represented
 the difference between the banks’ combined assets and liabilities.
>
 Imelda Singson, PDIC executive vice president, said PDIC would only
 shoulder the payment of insured deposits. Given that the Legacy-owned
 banks had a capital deficiency, clients with uninsured deposits—those in
 excess of the maximum deposit insurance coverage of P250,000 per person
 per bank—and creditors would not get paid.
>
 PDIC’s audit showed that the Legacy banks had combined assets of only
 P856.14 million as against the P19.82 billion in assets stated in the
banks’ books.
>
 “Clearly, there had been an overvaluation of the assets of the banks,”
 Singson said.
>
 Total liabilities of the banks as estimated by PDIC–both deposit
 liabilities and liabilities to creditors–amount to P17.49 billion.
>
“Because of the capital deficiency of the banks, other claimants
 [creditors and owners of uninsured deposits] would not be able to get
 paid,” Singson said, noting that even PDIC would not be able to get
 compensation from the payment of deposit claims.

PDIC: Fact or Fiction – Where is my check?

State-run Philippine Deposit Insurance Corp. (PDIC) has paid almost 63.27 percent of the P2.26-billion approved claims to Legacy Bank amid missing bank records and alleged fraud cases, president Jose C. Nograles said.

However, some 19,070 claims amounting to P2.55 billion were put on hold due to further verification although Nograles assured all valid claims would be paid soon.

In a statement, Nograles said P1.43 billion has been given to Legacy Bank depositors while P834.3million is scheduled for release.

“PDIC had been meticulous in the first and second phases of the validation in accordance with the standard procedures in claims processing. This is in response to the post-audit review that the Commission on Audit undertakes after payments are disbursed and sent to depositors through registered mail,” he added.

Depositors have been informed to submit necessary documents to confirm 21,819 claims amounting to P2.83 billion.

A total of 39,020 claims amounting to P4.76 billion are in process.

“Once these are validated, claimants will be sent their check payments or letters notifying them of the status of their claims,” he said.

The PDIC denied payment for 4,164 claims worth P204.07 million. Close to 82 percent were 3,429claims for non-existent accounts at P125.4 million while the balance of 709 claims worth P78.68 million were either fictitious or questionable accounts.

As of August, the PDIC has completed examination of accounts of 81 percent of the total 134,653 accounts at 109,791 while the remaining accounts with incomplete documents or referred to legal.

Nograles said claims processing, which is the second phase of the validation, is in full swing as individual claims filed together with required documents are verified prior to payout to determine that the right depositor is paid.

Accounting firm Punongbayan & Araullo has been tapped to scrutinize the schemes used by Legacy banks to deceive the public and the funding source for payouts of valid deposit insurance claims. - Ruby Anne M. Rubio, GMANews.TV

A Plea from An OFW from Angola, Africa

I am a single mother of two.  I started working in Angola since 1993 (my youngest was only 4 yrs old at that time). Angola is not a modern country and  is a malaria-infested area and malaria is endemic, in fact,  99% of expats who work here gets malaria.  However, I stayed, suffered, cried  and tenaciously persevered in order for me to give education to my children and offer them some basic necessities and comforts in life. Since 1993, I have been saving some money as our work is only contractual . Through hard work and good relationship with my superiors, I am able to keep my job. It is not as  easy as you think, because,  racial discrimination is rampant, but I did not allow this to overpower me as I need this job to sustain my family.

In 2007, a friend of mine, also a co-deadboler, mentioned about Rural Bank of Paranaque which offers 20% interest pa, 5-year time deposit.  At
first, I didn’t take notice of it as I have not really tried any rural banks. But after thinking about it and considering the PDIC’s stability and iron-clad
protection of our monies, I have finally decided to make deposits. First, I opened an account with RBOP, together with my 2 sons and mother. We have availed the PDIC’s maxiumum insurance deposit.  As I have pooled all my savings, I was able to open more accounts with the so-called Legacy Banks which are Dynamic Bank & Rural Bank of San Jose, the same amounts as Rural Bank of Paranaque, together with my 2 sons and mother. I was quite happy with the interests earned and thought that when I retire soon, my family and I can live off from those interests. So when these banks started to close in Dec 2008, I was devastated.  I got sick with malaria from
January until April…it just kept coming back.  In Feb 2009, I was hospitalized but the doctor can’t find anything that caused my severeheadache, he then ruled it as STRESS. It was stress- related headache due to my financial collapse per se!!!

As days went by, my friends in the internet who are also depositors of legacy banks, formed a group called  DEADBOL. Since joining this group, I felt better and found hope about my money.  In June 2009, I received payment from PDIC, 7% only of my total deposits but nothing for my 2 sons’s accounts & my mother’s.

PDIC kept moving their payment deadlines, at first, they said end of April, then end of June, then end of July, then end of August, then end of October etc…..in short, just empty promises.

Please PDIC, give me back my money….those are my savings for the last 15 years and without that money, I do not have anything when I retire very soon. As an OFW, don’t you think that the government need to step in to help us? Aren’t we the supposedly “new heroes” sending our hard-earned money to the Philippines to help stimulate the economy? Isn’t it time for the government especially PDIC to give back to us?

PDIC: Where art thou??

I have been praying every night so that PDIC will hear my pleas. I thought, the people in the Philippines are God-fearing, God-loving, and compassionate. To my dismay, it is the other way around. They are all hypocrites.

Where is my money? Until now I have not been paid yet. I am eating dried fish, sometimes I eat once a day instead of three, I only buy cheap food. I got sick, but could not afford a hospital anymore.

I am suffering, just like a lot of people in the Philippines. My friends are in the same boat: one need to go back to Africa to work, one need to go back to his home country to look for a job, one need to have 2 jobs back to back to send his wife some money, one has to borrow money from his friends just to make ends meet.

When will all these  sufferings end? Where art thou PDIC?

PDIC: Something Positive! But Where is my check??

Pdic wants failed banks barred from biddings

By Michelle Remo
Philippine Daily Inquirer
First Posted 19:30:00 08/30/2009

Filed Under: Banking

philippine deposit insurance Corp. wants owners of a failed bank barred from participating in biddings aimed at selling the closed financial institution.

The deposit insurer is also proposing that it be allowed to sell a bank placed under receivership even without the consent of the owners.

Pdic wants its proposals to be part of the bill seeking to amend the charter of the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas that is pending in Congress. The bill was earlier certified as urgent by President Macapagal-Arroyo.

Pdic president Jose Nograles told the Inquirer that under current rules, owners of a failed bank may still participate in biddings organized by Pdic.

“What we want is to disallow them from buying back their bank,” Nograles said. He said it was not prudent to allow old owners to buy back a failed bank, stressing this must already be run by people who are likely to manage it better.

Nograles also said that currently, Pdic is required to seek permission of the owners of a failed bank before it can sell the company. He said this hampers the process of the sale and efforts of the regulator to improve the overall health of the banking industry.

Pdic is the government agency mandated to settle claims of depositors of failed banks. Together with this mandate is its oversight function of the banking industry together with the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas.

Pdic wants the two proposals included as provisions of the bill seeking to amend the bsp charter. A law amending the charter of Pdic was passed earlier this year, but it failed to include provisions on the two proposals of Pdic.

Nograles said some congressmen did not approve of the Pdic proposals and the agency was hopeful these would be included in the bill seeking to amend the bsp’s charter.

The bsp has been pushing for amendments to its charter. One of the provisions in the proposed bill would allow the central bank to buy and sell its own bonds. The bsp said that being allowed to trade its own bonds was needed so that it could better manage liquidity in the economy. Monetary officials said the bsp was the only central bank in the world that was not allowed to trade its own bonds.

The bsp also wants its examiners exempted from the Deposit Secrecy Law. Monetary officials said the inability of central bank examiners to check on bank deposits hamper its efforts to immediately trace unsafe and unsound banking practices and to detect money laundering activities.

The central bank also wants its officials and concerned employees immune from legal suits arising from decisions to close banks. The bsp said its moves to close banks believed to be involved in unscrupulous transactions were sometimes being hampered by legal suits filed by the owners.

For instance, it said rural banks owned by the Legacy Group were supposed to have been closed much earlier were it not for a court-issued temporary restraining order. The banks were closed late last year following the decision of the Supreme Court to lift the TRO, but the involved rural banks were able to solicit more deposits from the public during the effectivity of the court restraining order.

 
 

PDIC and BSP : Where is my check ?

PDIC, BSP to put up P2.5B incentive fund

 

By Michelle Remo
Philippine Daily Inquirer
First Posted 23:58:00 08/31/2009

 

MANILA, Philippines – The Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas and Philippine Deposit Insurance Corp. have agreed to contribute P2.5 billion each to establish a proposed fund that will be tapped to extend incentives to banks willing to acquire financially troubled rural banks.

This was according to PDIC president Jose Nograles, who told reporters that the fund was expected to be put up before the end of the year.

He said PDIC would source its contribution from the deposit insurance fund (DIF) that it manages. The DIF is the pool of funds that is tapped by PDIC to service claims of depositors of failed banks.

“Because the DIF is what we use to pay out claims related to closure of banks, we [PDIC] thought it was prudent to also use this for a measure aimed at preventing bank closures,” Nograles said.

The establishment of a fund to grant incentives to white knights is consistent with the policy of PDIC and the BSP to encourage consolidation in the rural banking sector. The coregulators prefer to have fewer but strong banks, he said.

The BSP and PDIC are finalizing the rules and regulations for the extension of incentives to acquiring banks. According to the initial draft of the IRR, however, the incentives may come in the form of loans or equity infusion to the investor-bank.

To qualify for incentives, the acquiring bank must be financially sound and the bank to be acquired must have a capital adequacy ratio below 10 percent, which is the minimum required by the BSP.

The amount of incentives to be given to the investor-bank will be based on the amount of capital deficiency of the troubled bank. PDIC and BSP will source from the fund up to 40 percent of the amount needed to make the troubled bank meet the capitalization requirement. The balance of 60 percent must be shouldered by the investor-bank.

“BSP and PDIC will only help in providing counterpart funding. The bigger share should be shouldered by the investor-bank,” Nograles said.

The move to put up a fund is intended to strengthen the rural banking industry.

Since the start of the year, there have been 15 rural banks placed under the receivership of PDIC. These are on top of the 13 rural banks owned by the Legacy Group that were closed late last year. The closure of the banks will require PDIC to shell out billions of pesos to settle claims of depositors.

“PDIC is committed to assist the rural banking industry in strengthening the rural banks and ensuring their long-term viability,” Nograles said.

Nograles said rural banks comprise about 86 percent of the total number of banks in the Philippine banking system, thus making them significant players in the industry.

PDIC: What is your priority? the depositors or the banks?

Regulators ready P5-B incentive program to push bank mergers

BANKING regulators are coming up with P5 billion in incentives to
encourage rural banks to merge and thereby create stronger and more
viable institutions.

In a statement, the Philippine Deposit Insurance Corp. (PDIC) said it is
establishing a P5-billion fund together with the Bangko Sentral ng
Pilipinas
(BSP), of which the state deposit insurer would account for
half, and the central bank, the other half of the total amount.

PDIC President Jose C. Nograles told BusinessWorld the insurer would dip
into its deposit insurance fund, from which insurance payments are
sourced, to come up with the amount.

“The PDIC is committed… in strengthening the rural banks and ensuring
their long-term viability,” he said in the PDIC statement.

“By encouraging them to merge and consolidate, these merged institutions
will attain economies of scale, achieve higher lending capacities and
improve the quality of their banking services particularly in their
niche markets thus, help ensure the efficiency and effectiveness of
rural banks in mobilizing savings and investments toward a robust
economy particularly in the countryside.”

The PDIC has been put under strain by the series of rural bank failures,
the most notable of which were of those belonging to the Legacy Group.

Under the incentives scheme, regulators would provide funds either in
the form of direct loans or preferred shares to boost a bank’s capital.
The preferred shares shall be non-voting, cumulative and convertible to
common shares, the PDIC said.

The incentives, which would be available for two years, would be
available to banks with a risk-asset ratio of less than 10% and merging
or consolidating with eligible strategic third party investors (STPI).

An STPI, the PDIC said, must have a CAMELS (capital adequacy, asset
quality, management and board oversight, earnings, liquidity, and
sensitivity to market risk) of at least 3.

It should not be under the prompt corrective action program of the BSP
for having higher-than-normal risk of failure, and should not have
findings of unsafe and unsound practices.

The incentives scheme would be on top of the agreement signed recently
by the BSP and PDIC that speeds up the processing of applications for
mergers.

Central bank data showed that rural and cooperative banks’ assets
totaled P156.49 billion as of end-March, or 2.7% of the entire banking
system’s assets. While their resources cannot match those of universal
and commercial banks, rural banks comprise about 86% of the total number
of banks in the country and extend their reach up to fifth class
municipalities, the PDIC noted.

Tomas S. Gomez IV, spokesman of the Rural Bankers Association of the
Philippines, said the organization has been talking to the two
regulators on the matter since November last year.

“The RBAP is fully supportive of this policy to accelerate consolidation
in the rural bank sector,” Mr. Gomez said in a text message. — Gerard S.
dela Peña