PDIC: What is your priority? the depositors or the banks?

Regulators ready P5-B incentive program to push bank mergers

BANKING regulators are coming up with P5 billion in incentives to
encourage rural banks to merge and thereby create stronger and more
viable institutions.

In a statement, the Philippine Deposit Insurance Corp. (PDIC) said it is
establishing a P5-billion fund together with the Bangko Sentral ng
Pilipinas
(BSP), of which the state deposit insurer would account for
half, and the central bank, the other half of the total amount.

PDIC President Jose C. Nograles told BusinessWorld the insurer would dip
into its deposit insurance fund, from which insurance payments are
sourced, to come up with the amount.

“The PDIC is committed… in strengthening the rural banks and ensuring
their long-term viability,” he said in the PDIC statement.

“By encouraging them to merge and consolidate, these merged institutions
will attain economies of scale, achieve higher lending capacities and
improve the quality of their banking services particularly in their
niche markets thus, help ensure the efficiency and effectiveness of
rural banks in mobilizing savings and investments toward a robust
economy particularly in the countryside.”

The PDIC has been put under strain by the series of rural bank failures,
the most notable of which were of those belonging to the Legacy Group.

Under the incentives scheme, regulators would provide funds either in
the form of direct loans or preferred shares to boost a bank’s capital.
The preferred shares shall be non-voting, cumulative and convertible to
common shares, the PDIC said.

The incentives, which would be available for two years, would be
available to banks with a risk-asset ratio of less than 10% and merging
or consolidating with eligible strategic third party investors (STPI).

An STPI, the PDIC said, must have a CAMELS (capital adequacy, asset
quality, management and board oversight, earnings, liquidity, and
sensitivity to market risk) of at least 3.

It should not be under the prompt corrective action program of the BSP
for having higher-than-normal risk of failure, and should not have
findings of unsafe and unsound practices.

The incentives scheme would be on top of the agreement signed recently
by the BSP and PDIC that speeds up the processing of applications for
mergers.

Central bank data showed that rural and cooperative banks’ assets
totaled P156.49 billion as of end-March, or 2.7% of the entire banking
system’s assets. While their resources cannot match those of universal
and commercial banks, rural banks comprise about 86% of the total number
of banks in the country and extend their reach up to fifth class
municipalities, the PDIC noted.

Tomas S. Gomez IV, spokesman of the Rural Bankers Association of the
Philippines, said the organization has been talking to the two
regulators on the matter since November last year.

“The RBAP is fully supportive of this policy to accelerate consolidation
in the rural bank sector,” Mr. Gomez said in a text message. — Gerard S.
dela Peña

Bank failures cap PDIC fund growth

By Michelle Remo
Philippine Daily Inquirer

Posted date: August 15, 2009

THE INSURANCE FUND FOR THE COUNtry’s deposit insurer is not likely to
grow this year because of the string of closures of rural banks over the
past months that involve billions of peso worth of claims.

The deposit insurance fund (DIF)—which grew to P60.5 billion last year
from P53.4 billion in 2007—is the accumulated premium payments of
member-banks to the Philippine Deposit Insurance Corp. The fund is used
by PDIC to service claims of depositors of failed banks.

PDIC president Jose Nograles said that since the start of the year,
there have been 15 rural banks and two thrift banks placed under
receivership. The figure includes the rural banks owned by the Legacy Group.

Nograles said PDIC expects to spend close to P15 billion this year to
settle claims of depositors of the closed rural banks. On the other
hand, he said, revenues likely to be generated by PDIC from its
investments and premium collection will also be around P15 billion.

Banks that are members of PDIC are required to pay insurance premiums,
proceeds of which go straight to the DIF. Proceeds from investments of
PDIC also revert to the DIF.

“We expect the DIF to remain the same this year because of the amount we
have to spend for claims,” Nograles said in an interview.

He said PDIC expects to generate anywhere between P6 billion and P7
billion this year from its investments, which are mostly in government
securities, and about P8 billion from premium payments of member-banks.

Earlier, Congress enacted into law the bill raising the minimum deposit
insurance coverage
from P250,000 to P500,000 per depositor per bank.

PDIC, however, said the increase would not immediately affect the DIF
because the law is not retroactive.

©Copyright 2001-2009 INQUIRER.net, An Inquirer Company

PDIC: A plea from a foreigner

When I discovered the Philippines back in 2005 I was amazed at the resilience and pride of its people and the natural beauty of the landscape, it was intoxicating.  I have visited it 12 times since meeting my fiance and we are expecting our first child, Brianna, by the end of the month.  Starting last August of ‘08, I had made deposits within the Legacy banks because they had been around for 11 years or so and had PDIC coverage as all banks in the Philippines are required to have.  Not only would this be a way to provide for my fiance and her family but it made a lot of sense to create a strong connection and commitment to the Philippines and to my retirement planning for the rest of my life. 

 
     When the Legacy banks closed their doors back in December, I was shocked like everybody else to learn of the criminal activity that had been going on with the top officials of these banks, but isn’t that always how banks seem to close??  Somebody or a group of officers get greedy and/or make poor decisions that do serious damage to their balance sheets or maybe they skim money and ‘cook the books’.  Whatever the reason for the bank closure, its NOT the depositors that should be burdened with the inner dealings of the bank officers.  Its not my fault!  If the PDIC thought these banks were not good banks, they should have had BSP investigate and and take ACTION years ago to protect innocent depositors like myself. 
 
     Now, fastforward 8 months, to date, I have heard not the slightest peep from PDIC on the status of my claims.  Why is this so?  What about all the ‘outside help’ that was supposed to speed up our claims?  I am to believe that somehow by a miracle the PDIC will one day just tell me that my claims have been verified and are ready for payment?  Can somebody please tell me how long it take for thousands of staff at PDIC to cover 130,000 accounts?  Surely they have found the ‘fictitious accounts’ by now and can pay the real ones, right??
 
     Now I’m thinking, do they have the money?  Do they have the money but they just don’t want to payout?  How will I react if they tell me that they don’t have any record of my deposit?  They will see my receipts but will this be good enough in their eyes?  How will they go home at the end of the day knowing in their heart of hearts that they have denied me, an innocent depositor?  Will they ‘feel good’ about protecting the ‘DIF’ but NOT the depositor?  Can they really get away with it?  So far, YES!  I mean, this is mind boggling just to think of how I would handle that situation.  Who can I turn to? 
 
     These are my clouded thoughts that stay with me each and every day.  I am still hopeful that me and my family’s claims are ultimately paid but until then, I will continue to have many sleepless nights pondering.  And as I struggle to support my fiance and family, I wonder if PDIC’s decision makers and influencial people really care at all?  I mean, how do they sleep at night knowing they are doing an injustice to depositors like myself?  Do they really think they can hide behind their statements of missing documents forever?  Take a look at my receipts, you have my CTD’s, why the mystery??  When will this all end and more importantly how will this end?
   

PDIC : Great Mathematician

 I love my country, I have defended it to death. I buy Filipino even when I am abroad. I buy local when I come home. I send money to my family, friends and people I do not even know. I help a lot to stir the economy especially when I go on vacation to the Philippines. I spend like crazy when i am on vacation.
Am I being penalized for being patriotic?
Is this the time for the government to step in and give back to the poor OFW’s/immigrants who are the so called “new heroes” or “stupid heroes” ?
Will PDIC save our future? They have a vision to be world-class.. let us examine..
Looks like PDIC have done their math well. Nine months is September for those banks which closed last December.  They really studied their charter for their advantage so as to delay as long as possible the payout.
Some more insult to injury..
Do I have to remain patriotic nowadays?
Would you be if you were in my shoes?

PDIC: Look at the Mirror

Mirror, Mirror on the wall,
Will PDIC pay at all?
If they do, when will that be?
Why do they prolong our agony?
 

The Legacy of Philippine Deposit Insurance Corporation (PDIC)

Legacy is defined by Merriam-Webster as 1: a gift by will especially of money or other personal property, 2: something transmitted by or received from an ancestor or predecessor or from the past.

Let’s examine the “legacy” the PDIC is bestowing on bank depositors in the Philippines.

The group of Legacy banks closed in mid December 2008. In March and April 2009, three to four months after the closing, PDIC finally accepted claims from the innocent depositors that believed that banks licensed to operate by BSP and insured by PDIC were legitimate and safe banks.

PDIC stated that the processing of claims would be complete by the end of April and depositors that had filed claims would then receive their check payment or letter indicating the status of their claims through registered mail. When depositors objected to the use of local registered mail the PDIC assured depositors that the local registered mail system was efficient, safe and they had used it for years and never lost a check.

The end of April came and went and PDIC, acting as if they never previously announced a completion date, announced that processing would be complete by 15 June. Then they again announced that processing would be completed by the end of June and then by the end of July and now some have been told “check back at the end of August”.

Not once has PDIC ever addressed why they continue to fail to meet their stated deadlines; it’s as if the previous completion dates never existed and are just a figment of depositor’s imagination.

PDIC also claims they will have paid all legitimate claims by the end of October 2009; given their historical record of keeping promises how many believe this. Maybe this will also become another figment of depositor’s imagination?

Even though PDIC claims the local registered mail system is safe and efficient many depositors are finding they cannot believe these proclamations by PDIC either and here’s why.

Registered mail from PDIC has been simply dropped off with whatever guard happens to be standing at the entrance of a subdivision with the hope that another guard over the next few days will see the intended recipient and pass the registered letter to them.

Registered mail sent from Makati to addresses within the NCR usually takes ten days to arrive. Those sent to other large cities like Cebu usually takes 21 days to arrive. When sent to the provinces they can take 30 days or more.

In a number of instances we find that the local post office simply holds them at the post office in the hope that the recipient will know they have a registered letter and will come to pick it up; no notice is given to the recipient by the post office maybe because they assume PDIC notified the depositor by other means that a registered letter will be at the post office by a specified date.

Many of these “safely and efficiently transmitted” letters impose a two week deadline for recipients to respond to PDIC or be subject to denial of claims. This appears to be an unrealistic requirement based on the PDIC fantasy that the local registered mail system is efficient and safe which anyone else knows is not true.

Let’s consider the two week response requirement. Let’s assume that PDIC allows two days for the depositor to comply with the requirement. That leaves twelve days for the mail to make the round trip or six days each way including weekends. Given that even within Manila the normal delivery time is ten days then there is no way a reasonable person can comply with the two week requirement. So this appears to another fantasy on the part of PDIC.

Is this the legacy of PDIC?

Continuously missed deadlines that are treated as if they never happened.

Using an unreliable registered mail system while claiming it is efficient and reliable.

You be the judge!

When will I see my money again?

A lot have been said by PDIC, that they will pay within 6 months of date of filing of claims not  bank closure.. It is almost 6 months. It will be six months in September. I have not heard anything about my accounts. I filed it in March 23rd, 2009. No peep nor ni ha ni no, what is happening?

Are we going to have a long wait to see our money again? Some non-deadbol and DEADBOL members have received a few checks, no systematic distribution, no organization, just shooting in the dark, like a lottery, I guess.  The people who need the money the most did not get any. What an irony!!

One depositor got 15 checks, while another got half a check..but, those who really need the checks got Zero! What a pity!

One person got his check recently from PDIC. It was really good for him, however, took the registered mail to arrive to him in 21 days. Is this the world class service PDIC is talking about? What type of mail system takes 21 days to arrive to a recipient? Did the envelope swim by itself or maybe they used pigeons just like the olden days. Is this the postal system in my country? What a joke! I am truly embarrassed..

When will I see my money again? Are we being tortured because we deposited in rural banks? Why allow the rural banks to  stay in business anyway if PDIC cannot deliver what has been promised? Rural banks are still their responsibility..

Is this the beginning or is this the end? When will I see my money again?

PDIC – What is the ulterior motive?

PDIC teaches judges, courts
Updated July 14, 2009 12:00 AM

 

MANILA, Philippines – The Philippine Deposit Insurance Corp. (PDIC) and Philippine Judicial Academy (PhilJA) has entered into a landmark partnership to conduct a comprehensive deposit insurance seminar to judges and court personnel, to formalize their shared vision of enhancing the appreciation and understanding of deposit insurance and banking laws for greater depositor protection, PDIC President Jose C. Nograles and PhilJA Chancellor Justice Adolfo S. Azcuna agreed to hold a seminar-workshop on deposit insurance, banking practices, and bank conservatorship, receivership and liquidation, in connection with PhilJA’s continuing legal education and PDIC’s public awareness campaign for the new deposit insurance law or Republic Act (RA) 9576 that took effect on June 1, 2009.

The conduct of the seminar-workshop started last month, and a series of seminar workshops in Luzon, Visayas and Mindanao will be held within the year.

Ricky Carandang Show – The Legacy Mess

Because of the many inaccurate news articles that appeared in the newspapers the past few months, it seem to be a widespread belief that most of the deposits made in the so-called ‘Legacy Banks’ were fishy or splitted accounts, or somehow it was believed that the depositors were in the wrong – which they are definitely NOT.

To take away the rumors and uncertainties, DEADBOL together with Ricky Carandang arranged a live show with Jose C. Nograles and team to let them explain and clarify the most pertinent inaccurate ‘news’ in the printed media.

Source:
The Big Picture, Hosted by Ricky Carandang, Thursday June 18, 20009 (ANC)
Title: The Legacy Mess

Live guests: Jose C. Nograles (President PDIC), Romeo M. Mendoza Jr. (PDIC General Counsel), Imelda S. Singzon (Executive Vice President PDIC)
Telephone guest: Raymond Rodis (Founder DEADBOL)

Below are the most relevant parts of the show that provide a clear view of what is real: and not those rumors mentioned in most printed news. At the end of this report is a link to the whole show for your reference.

Issue:
The PDIC charter defines splitting of deposits as the occurrence whenever a deposit account with an outstanding balance of more than the statutory maximum amount of insured deposit maintained under the name of natural or juridical persons is broken down and transferred into two or more accounts in the name/s of natural or juridical persons or entities who have no beneficial ownership on transferred deposits in their names within thirty (30) days immediately preceding or during a bank-declared bank holiday, or immediately preceding a closure order issued by the Monetary Board of the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas for the purpose of availing of the maximum deposit insurance coverage; (As added by R.A. 9302, 12 August 2004).

Question:
A depositor opens several individual, joint accounts, and ITF accounts wherein each of the accounts are within PDIC´s maximum deposit insurance coverage. The bank closes after three days from date of opening these accounts. Are these accounts covered by PDIC insurance?

Video Response:

http://www.deadbol.com/deadbol/media_flv/deadbol_the_legacy_mess_ricky_carandang_2.flv

Issue:
There have been made quite some ‘remote’ deposit transactions, and through all the media in the papers it became unclear how PDIC treats this legally.

Question:
You know that deadbol is made of foreigners and filipinos from all walks of life living here and abroad. It is not uncommon for foreigners and Filipinos that are based abroad to have opened legacy bank accounts by remitting/transferring funds to a Legacy bank account in a commercial bank, like Landbank, RCBC, Asiatrust, and the other banks.   The legacy bank upon receipt of these funds and personal information sheet of the depositors, issued certificate of time deposits or passbooks in the name of the designated account holders.  How do you treat this banking transaction? and there’s a lot of them.

Video Response:

http://www.deadbol.com/deadbol/media_flv/deadbol_the_legacy_mess_ricky_carandang_4.flv

Issue:
Some media suggested that opening two or more deposit accounts with ONE check would not be covered by PDIC insurance.

Question:
If somebody- depositor- issues a check that covers all those multiple accounts opened, single account, joint accounts but it came from one check and normally it is drawn in the name of the bank, the legacy bank, is that ok?

Video Response:

http://www.deadbol.com/deadbol/media_flv/deadbol_the_legacy_mess_ricky_carandang_6.flv

Issue:
You recently announced that PDIC has no legal obligation to pay claims for deposit accounts not found in the master list of the Legacy banks as of date of PDIC bank takeover. You explained that the deposit should be recorded in the bank´s records and it should show evidence of cash flow.

Question:
I have a question here: You recently announced that PDIC has no legal obligation to pay claims for deposit accounts not found in the master list of the Legacy bank as of date of PDIC bank takeover.  You explained that the deposit should be recorded in the bank’s records and it should show evidence of cash flow.  The question is: Do you need all those six bank documents that you mentioned, or would one record among 6 or 8 bank records (if you include the teller’s blotter or a computer record), be sufficient enough to establish the validity of an account?  So the question is-  do you need all 6 to be there or 8 or even one of the 6 or the eight would suffice?

Video Response:
http://www.deadbol.com/deadbol/media_flv/deadbol_the_legacy_mess_ricky_carandang_8.flv

To see the full show, click the below link:
DEADBOL: The Legacy Mess, The Big Picture, Ricky Carandang, Thursday June 18, 2009

deadbol_the_legacy_mess_part2_ricky_carandang.flv
Credits: Video recording by LAV  ,  Video material: ©Ricky Carandang, ANC

DEADBOL : A PMT Jargon

Flaming enthusiasm, backed up by horse sense and persistence, is the quality that most frequently makes for success.
Dale Carnegie

DEADBOL is on the road for  more interviews, exposures and tet-a-tet with PDIC personnel. The encounter  is rather a bit confidential. We do not want anybody to know the specifics, just keep an eye on this website, and you might be able to catch some news about DEADBOL.

Why should you join DEADBOL? Because they want results.

Thanks to all sympathizers,  DEADBOL is now  the new PMT jargon.